From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4EF4717A7 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D5648BF6A for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 69AE6BF5E for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 33F0F467E7 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:15:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <8bc1c2e9-efeb-7ef8-8baf-7ff9e4b1f0dc@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:15:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/90.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= References: <20210624081802.2090614-1-dietmar@proxmox.com> <20210624081802.2090614-2-dietmar@proxmox.com> <1624954307.zu1un8wckr.astroid@nora.none> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <1624954307.zu1un8wckr.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.575 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager] ui: implement OpenId login X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:15:56 -0000 On 29.06.21 10:13, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote: > not directly related to this patch - we should probably disable TFA for= =20 > openid realms (and their users), since TFA would need to be handled at = > the openid provider in that case.. e.g., if I login via openid and then= =20 > hit TFA in the top right corner user menu, I get prompted for a passwor= d=20 > to setup TFA which is of course not possible ;) Yes true, both TFA and probably also "edit password" would be disabled, Dietmar mentioned the lack of that already in an off-list talk last week to me. The realm add/edit window you mentioned in your other reply shouldn't be that hard, Dominik can probably do that in an hour, but yes certainly wan= ted for full inclusion. So agreeing on both counts, just mentioning that there was awareness abou= t those two points, and both should be addressable with relatively low effo= rt.