From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 343516A8FD for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:32:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2AA5429939 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:32:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5C4E72992C for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:32:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 20D97462DD for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:32:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <8b7c1ce4-adf8-585f-55c6-5a2cdde2bc0e@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:32:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:87.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/87.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Reiter References: <20210304125209.24078-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> <20210304125209.24078-5-s.reiter@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20210304125209.24078-5-s.reiter@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.052 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] NAK: [PATCH qemu-server 4/7] add postinst with Windows device incompatibility workaround X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 21:32:47 -0000 On 04.03.21 13:52, Stefan Reiter wrote: > ...for QEMU 5.2 > > Add a postinst with some inline perl (to avoid having to install a > seperate file to run) that conservatively does its best to set the > machine version for all VMs the bug might affect to 5.1. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter > --- > > Requires Fabian's #3301 series: > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2021-March/047175.html > > I did it as inline perl because I wasn't sure where to put a file containing > this to be able to execute it from postinst without cluttering the machine after > it is done. Feel free to extract it somewhere else if you see fit. > > Might also make sense to update the link from the forum for "more details" to > the cover of this series, or something else... > > debian/postinst | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 debian/postinst > Dropped this one, I know partially my fault in making you go this direction, but Fabi is right, and we even talked about how to handle restore ourself in persona, IIRC - so no idea how we could even go for this approach (dealing which such effects of decades old design decisions, which naturally lack the benefit of the hindsight, is always a PITA).