From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87421FF13F for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:15:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 19DD13D4A; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:15:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <89ef982f-894a-48ee-9534-57b6d0757560@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:15:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 00/10] enable qemu vm architecture selection From: Fiona Ebner To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Dominik Csapak References: <20260128123035.2576774-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <70676d12-bda7-4f8a-bf87-b7b985afa7fc@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <70676d12-bda7-4f8a-bf87-b7b985afa7fc@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1769692466723 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.015 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: YIGDLRRX7QJHZUQW2N2KZ74RQJKGTHHR X-Message-ID-Hash: YIGDLRRX7QJHZUQW2N2KZ74RQJKGTHHR X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 29.01.26 um 2:12 PM schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Am 28.01.26 um 1:29 PM schrieb Dominik Csapak: >> other nice to haves not yet done, that also invovle changing the backend: >> * 'virt' machine support in our api, so one can choose older versions > > AFAICT, this is already supported by the API? Ah, I suppose it's about the querying endpoint like mentioned in the other mail (sorry, had already written this before reading that ;P)