From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D321FF138 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:21:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2B376214AC; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:21:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <890db7c0-3ab7-4087-8ca3-6fe88a92b21c@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:21:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH pve-storage v2 03/17] api: plugins/storage: add initial routes and endpoints To: "Max R. Carrara" , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260717154943.696411-1-m.carrara@proxmox.com> <20260717154943.696411-4-m.carrara@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jakob Klocker In-Reply-To: <20260717154943.696411-4-m.carrara@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1784550085962 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.962 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 7YFZ4G3O3MGTH3FRYN42E7Y7OXOBOXFD X-Message-ID-Hash: 7YFZ4G3O3MGTH3FRYN42E7Y7OXOBOXFD X-MailFrom: j.klocker@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: missed a nit before On 7/17/26 5:50 PM, Max R. Carrara wrote: [snip] > + return $result; > + }, > +}); style-nit: newline is missing > +1;