From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C359663666 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE15923EA2 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [89.248.211.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1C47E23E98 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E9B15BAC3D for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id g5V0dFgUvbPB for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA0B15BACA4 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailpro.odiso.com Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id i--rxwoJyCEc for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [10.1.31.111]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CBC15BACA0 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:28:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexandre DERUMIER To: Proxmox VE development discussion Message-ID: <890410297.26903.1598340513251.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1494951154.2394588.1597820244987.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3866 (ZimbraWebClient - GC83 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3844) Thread-Topic: does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do test ? Thread-Index: oJHY3Xz1LFPFU2Ss1vzqfIWcWtDQqg== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.400 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do test ? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:28:36 -0000 Hi Stephan, Thanks for the help >>What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production >>servers, then I think I can help you. I would like to do a lot of setup test, so I'll break your production ;) I'm going to test routed setup, but also bgp-evpn,etc... I have a friend working at ovh, I'll try to have some server to test. but thanks anyway. >>They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failover= =20 >>of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it=20 >>works.=20 Interesting, you have failover le full /28 block between server ? If yes, do you have done it manually ? or through the api ? (In the future, I would like to implemented auto failover with keepalived/v= rrp or something like that) ----- Mail original ----- De: "Stephan Leemburg" =C3=80: "Proxmox VE development discussion" Envoy=C3=A9: Samedi 22 Ao=C3=BBt 2020 18:01:16 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do te= st ? Hi Alexandre,=20 Sorry for the late reply.=20 But actually, I do have 2 OVH based subscribed proxmox systems.=20 They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failover=20 of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it=20 works.=20 What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production=20 servers, then I think I can help you.=20 Kind regards,=20 Met vriendelijke groet,=20 Stephan Leemburg=20 IT Functions=20 e: sleemburg@it-functions.nl=20 p: +31 (0)71 889 23 33=20 m: +31(0)6 83 22 30 69=20 kvk: 27313647=20 On 19-08-2020 08:57, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:=20 > Hi,=20 >=20 > I'm currently looking to test ip failover (single /32 ip or subnet range)= =20 > on public provider like hetzner or ovh.=20 >=20 > I have see a lot of users asking questions on the forum about routed setu= p.=20 >=20 > /32 is a bit tricky with point to point configuration,=20 >=20 > and I'll would like to implement them in sdn configuration (as I'm workin= g on ip management).=20 >=20 >=20 > I just need a small server, 1 single failover /32 ip and 1 small failover= subnet.=20 >=20 >=20 > If nobody can help, no problem, I'll rent a small server for 1 month.=20 >=20 >=20 > Alexandre=20 >=20 >=20 > (BTW: I'll try to send a new sdn patch series next week, I'm currently wo= rking on ip dns api registration)=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________=20 > pve-devel mailing list=20 > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel=20 >=20 _______________________________________________=20 pve-devel mailing list=20 pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com=20 https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel=20