From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 136EE9C1C1 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:34:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EF00FDA52 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:34:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:34:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0813041DAE; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:34:37 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Lendl To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" , "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" In-Reply-To: References: <20231117114011.834002-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <87jzqbe4ex.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:34:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87r0kj2hgj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 cluster/network/manager/qemu-server/container/docs 00/33] Add support for DHCP servers to SDN X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:34:38 -0000 "DERUMIER, Alexandre" writes: > Another example with custom dhcpv6 options + client script > > https://serverfault.com/a/528425 Thank you very much for clarifying. So the /128 is fine. I also tried to ping6 dead:beef::1 to reach the gateway or from the host to reach the VM and that did not work. So I assume RA is not working correctly then?