From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.lendl@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF27E9DA76
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:54:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B6572392BC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:54:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:54:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0613142568;
 Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:54:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Lendl <s.lendl@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development
 discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <8f1c2587-e260-4a3b-97f5-dcdbcb571dcc@proxmox.com>
References: <87v8axbjh1.fsf@gmail.com>
 <20231027113000.2008166-1-s.lendl@proxmox.com>
 <8f1c2587-e260-4a3b-97f5-dcdbcb571dcc@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:54:43 +0200
Message-ID: <87h6mcmgak.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC SDN DHCP] Add and Remove DHCP mappings on vNIC
 add/remove
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:54:44 -0000


It is on top of Stefan Hanreich's patch series therefore I replied here
as I consider it a continuation of his efforts.

Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> writes:

> Am 27/10/2023 um 13:29 schrieb Stefan Lendl:
>> Sorry, Sending this again because I noticed that I messed up the subject
>> prefixes for the patches.
>
> I'd also prefer having such series as separate thread, not in reply to another
> (already big) series..
>
> Also, if I didn't overlook something, you nowhere state if this patch series
> is on top of Stefan Hanreich's, or stand alone..