From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F41878D27 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:22:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6A9D31976E for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C86381975D for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:21:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 98003427DC; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:21:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <87890f20-2924-fa20-58cc-98810668914c@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 07:21:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Samuel Lorch References: <01609953-b676-7b07-ff9f-ba3ae4f3312c@lorch.net> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <01609953-b676-7b07-ff9f-ba3ae4f3312c@lorch.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pve-manager] sdn: Adding phpIPAM as IPAM provider X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 05:22:07 -0000 Hi, On 02.05.21 20:49, Samuel Lorch wrote: > would it be possible to write Custom Plugins without recompiling any Proxmox Packages? > There's already patches for that on the list, so that is planned: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2021-April/047999.html > At work we have a custom IPAM System and it would be of massive help if i could just put a self written Plugin into some directory and it would be available for use as a IPAM provider. Sure. But I'll wait until IPAM client support is committed and we got some feedback on that to ensure the API as is can stay for a while. While Alexandre copied over the APIAGE and APVERSION mechanism we have in our storage plugin, and thus we can "break" that controlled I'd still like to avoid doing so immediately (extensions can be fine by bumping both, version and age). cheers, Thomas