From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70A591FF176
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri,  7 Mar 2025 12:03:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7785818FA1;
	Fri,  7 Mar 2025 12:03:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <87622580-d036-440c-9bcb-541071ae76aa@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 12:02:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250213131716.3062383-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20250213131716.3062383-6-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <69f9cb45-d0e3-4b28-8773-b7a8faa02dfe@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <69f9cb45-d0e3-4b28-8773-b7a8faa02dfe@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu-server v6 02/10] migrate: call
 vm_stop_cleanup after stopping in phase3_cleanup
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 3/6/25 17:42, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Am 13.02.25 um 14:17 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
>> we currently only call deactivate_volumes, but we actually want to call
>> the whole vm_stop_cleanup, since that is not invoked by the vm_stop
>> above (we cannot parse the config anymore) and might do other cleanups
>> we also want to do (like mdev cleanup).
>>
>> For this to work properly we have to clone the original config at the
>> beginning, since we might modify the volids.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> 
> applied, thanks!
> 
> It seems like other callers with nocheck are affected by this too?
> Namely, live-restore upon failure and the remote_migration in some cases
> (see the mtunnel API endpoint) also won't clean up the PCI devices etc.
> IIUC, or am I missing something?

probably yes, I'll have to look, thanks for noticing that!


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel