From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492C11FF16F for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:19:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E42342C7E4; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:19:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <8648f6fc-80e8-49c7-bb24-b20d6dd0f20c@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:19:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Daniel Herzig References: <20250113085608.99498-1-d.herzig@proxmox.com> <20250113085608.99498-12-d.herzig@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Daniel Kral In-Reply-To: <20250113085608.99498-12-d.herzig@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.012 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 11/12] fix #4225: ui: qemu: cdedit: enable required checkbox for isos X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 1/13/25 09:56, Daniel Herzig wrote: > Enables the 'required' checkbox for the IsoSelector. > If the parameter is not set, the backend will use the default (set to > 1). > > Behaviour: > * Only send parameter if not default (required=0) > * Checked if parameter is missing (default) > * Unchecked when adding a new CD-ROM IMO the part of this patch where new VMs get created with `required=0` CDROMs should be split into its own patch and marked as "for-9.0" or else add a TODO comment for the 9.0 release. Else this looks good, so consider this: Reviewed-by: Daniel Kral Tested-by: Daniel Kral _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel