From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E18469D315 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:09:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1F162D80E for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:09:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:09:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E4C8E4844D; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:09:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <85363362-f63f-5708-521d-fe7aabe58d96@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 18:09:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.1 Content-Language: en-US To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" , "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" , "aderumier@odiso.com" , "f.ebner@proxmox.com" , "elacunza@binovo.es" References: <20230522102528.186955-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <4d8191f2-4954-1e4f-a40c-51544289b2ce@proxmox.com> <036ad8c33f6af74da89eb8b9c24c1c6cda8fc938.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> <8277a27b-a70f-b731-69f7-fc9ae69b2da2@binovo.es> <5a05ae07-7002-8e3a-1e11-bd5269d58e4f@proxmox.com> <34e130a8-e3c0-8dc7-dd72-51d22a670f4a@proxmox.com> From: Aaron Lauterer In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.042 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.1 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES v3 qemu-server/manager/common] add and set x86-64-v2 as default model for new vms and detect best cpumodel X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 16:09:15 -0000 On 6/2/23 16:15, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote: > Thanks Aeron. > > I'll try to reproduce on my side on epyc milan. > AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor microcode patch_level=0x0a0011ce > (I just tried again with q35, but I'm still not able de reproduce) > > > can you share your full vmid.conf ? (numa ? vga ?..). On the Epyc Systems: args: -cpu Nehalem,enforce,+aes,-svm,-vmx,+kvm_pv_eoi,+kvm_pv_unhalt,vendor="GenuineIntel" bios: ovmf boot: order=scsi0;ide2;net0 cores: 2 cpu: host,flags=+aes efidisk0: local-storage:vm-104-disk-0,efitype=4m,size=1M ide2: iso-images:iso/debian-11.7.0-amd64-netinst.iso,media=cdrom,size=389M machine: q35 memory: 2048 meta: creation-qemu=7.2.0,ctime=1685631249 name: tmp-debtest net0: virtio=26:A2:08:6B:00:8F,bridge=vmbr0,firewall=1 numa: 0 ostype: l26 scsi0: local-storage:vm-104-disk-1,discard=on,iothread=1,size=8G scsihw: virtio-scsi-single smbios1: uuid=ef95de37-c93f-4987-820d-4f969913b03d sockets: 1 vmgenid: cb42b08c-9448-4821-b1e6-d018150de807 On the Ryzen system: args: -cpu kvm64,enforce,+kvm_pv_eoi,+kvm_pv_unhalt,+sep,+lahf_lm,+popcnt,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+ssse3 bios: ovmf boot: order=scsi0;ide2;net0 cores: 4 cpu: kvm64 efidisk0: local-zfs:vm-115-disk-1,efitype=4m,size=1M ide2: iso:iso/debian-11.6.0-amd64-netinst.iso,media=cdrom,size=388M machine: q35 memory: 2048 meta: creation-qemu=7.2.0,ctime=1685537448 name: debtest net0: virtio=AA:AA:7A:3A:F5:94,bridge=vmbr0,firewall=1 numa: 0 ostype: l26 scsi0: local-zfs:vm-115-disk-0,iothread=1,size=32G scsihw: virtio-scsi-single smbios1: uuid=05785fd0-69b7-4df7-a96e-962e030cdbca sockets: 1 vmgenid: 869bd693-3560-4cd1-a5be-f61ec158acef The CPU args are different, depending on what I tested last tested. > > do you use debian graphical install or console install ? the cli installer > > host kernel version ? (I'm still testing on 5.15 / qemu 7.4) On the Epyc Systems: $ pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 7.4-1 (running kernel: 6.2.6-1-pve) pve-manager: 7.4-3 (running version: 7.4-3/9002ab8a) pve-kernel-6.2: 7.3-8 pve-kernel-5.15: 7.3-3 pve-kernel-6.2.6-1-pve: 6.2.6-1 pve-kernel-5.15.102-1-pve: 5.15.102-1 pve-kernel-5.15.5-1-pve: 5.15.5-1 (…) qemu-server: 7.4-3 On the Ryzen System: $ pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 7.4-1 (running kernel: 6.2.11-2-pve) pve-manager: 7.4-4 (running version: 7.4-4/4a8501a8) pve-kernel-6.2: 7.4-3 pve-kernel-5.15: 7.4-3 pve-kernel-6.2.11-2-pve: 6.2.11-2 pve-kernel-6.2.11-1-pve: 6.2.11-1 pve-kernel-5.15.107-2-pve: 5.15.107-2 (…) qemu-server: 7.4-3 > > my last patch version use qemu64 as base without specifify the vendor, > so I think it should ok, but I would like to find what happend exactly > :) > > >