From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD16D65D7E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DAC73D1BD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 74888D1A3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 40BAD43359
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20200709124547.2913-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20200709124547.2913-4-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <83a4f565-81ce-b1e6-ba93-6ab49ce81a83@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:08:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200709124547.2913-4-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.172 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.344 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [prunebackups.pm, status.pm, pvesm.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 storage 3/7] Add API and pvesm call for
 prune_backups
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:08:04 -0000

Am 7/9/20 um 2:45 PM schrieb Fabian Ebner:
> For the pvesm call use a wrapper and a --dry-run option to redirect
> to the correct API call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v3:
>     * allow filtering by type
>     * pvesm: redirect to correct API call according to --dry-run
> 
>  PVE/API2/Storage/Makefile        |   2 +-
>  PVE/API2/Storage/PruneBackups.pm | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  PVE/API2/Storage/Status.pm       |   7 ++
>  PVE/CLI/pvesm.pm                 | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 PVE/API2/Storage/PruneBackups.pm
> 

applied, thanks!