From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186CC92FB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 17:06:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E711B842D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 17:05:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 17:05:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 88AAE45D17
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Mar 2023 17:05:51 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <82701573-4e32-550a-7842-d7b2b815754f@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 17:05:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:111.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/111.0
Content-Language: de-AT, en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20230308120919.1646218-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230308120919.1646218-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 manager 0/2] ui: ceph: improve
 discoverability of warning details
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 16:06:23 -0000

Am 08/03/2023 um 13:09 schrieb Aaron Lauterer:
> The goal for this small series is to make it easier/more obvious to see
> that there are potentially more details for a warning ceph is showing
> by:
> * having a tooltip with the details (limited in length)
> * making the detail/info button more visible
> 

One bug I see is that if I open the detail window, the next extjs (probably store)
refresh seemingly refocuses the some part of the row and then the tooltip pops up
too for the element I'm already having the full detail window open.

That said, why not avoid the tooltip but inline the info by moving the severity to
the right, dropping the info button completely and making the grid row expandable,
i.e., like the PMG tracking center grid does?

Would feel more integrated and less duplicate (tooltip + detail window)
information.