From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBEFD61D94;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:42:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D9AB125595;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6354525588;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2F9174469B;
 Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20200813115027.11333-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <81d2255e-ac6b-f02a-958c-6e9e3a4a8ce1@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:42:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/80.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200813115027.11333-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.051 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu] PVE: add zero block handling to
 PBS dump callback
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:42:40 -0000

On 13.08.20 13:50, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> Both the PBS and VMA dump callbacks assume that a NULL pointer can be
> passed as *pbuf, but that never happens, as backup-dump.c calls this
> function with contents of an iovec.
> 
> So first, remove that assumption and add an 'assert' to verify.
> 
> Secondly, while the vma-writer already does the buffer_is_zero check
> internally, for PBS we relied on that non-existant behaviour for zero
> chunks, so do the buffer_is_zero check manually and pass NULL to the
> rust lib in case it is true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> This increases backup speed to PBS for VMs with free space quite dramatically.
> 
>  pve-backup.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!