From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560E41FF189
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Apr 2025 14:44:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0CAA11EBFB;
	Fri,  4 Apr 2025 14:44:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <80baf0ca-51da-4b7c-b49d-8d238d1793a9@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:43:51 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
References: <20250404075957.80057-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
 <s8oa58w72hl.fsf@proxmox.com>
 <84420a11-0b5f-443f-99b3-bd517725a31c@proxmox.com>
 <9bf859f5-99a2-461a-9ad0-8d983474d2d0@proxmox.com>
 <s8o1pu86zs6.fsf@proxmox.com>
 <327a96ce-6884-445d-9bc2-6b94e68662f6@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <327a96ce-6884-445d-9bc2-6b94e68662f6@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.010 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH corosync] corosync.service: add patch to
 reduce log spam in broken network setups
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 04/04/2025 11:40, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> I am starting to lean towards not limiting this here. However, I have
>> seen multiple instances at our support portal where logs are rotated
>> rather quickly and useful messages are lost.
> 
> In dmesg (kernel ring buffer) sure, but the systemd journal should not
> really be affected of such limitations, and such similar logs should
> compress very well and not cause that much growth.
> And FWIW rate-limiting is also a loss of logs, so it's really a trade
> of.
> 
> If more than a handful of people run into this, we can also add the
> rate-limit log stanza to the release notes known issue section (where
> a general entry might be nice in any way) with direction for how to
> create a systemd service override similar to Maximiliano's proposal
> but for /etc. People can also always downgrade.

OK, sounds good!

> I'm just not comfortable rate-limiting such an important service with
> the justifications presented so far.


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel