From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DE077391
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:52:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F24C11E846
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:51:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id F0F1E1E838
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:51:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C7F7E45EF7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:51:54 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <7e6e5b21-e153-e847-a579-3a38610c8b25@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:51:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/94.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
References: <20211011125520.1124937-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
 <20211011125520.1124937-3-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211011125520.1124937-3-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.185 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager 2/3] ui: SystemEdit: promote
 advanced settings to normal
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:52:26 -0000

On 11.10.21 14:55, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> and reorder the panel a bit, as otherwise I found it *very* cluttered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/manager6/qemu/SystemEdit.js | 50 +++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

But I still find that the visual separation of the hr + space of the advanced section
provided some UX improvement, felt less crowded that way.

Maybe we can place that in a box+<legend>Firmware</legend> thingy or at least have a
Label-only element with "Firmware" in columnt 1 and an empty element in column 2 to
somewhat replicate that visual grouping?

@Dominik: better ideas?