From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C85771C17 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:37:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A2F6242A3 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A588324297 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:36:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6C0EA42A83 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:36:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <7dbe49b0-3a35-c53f-6e56-e43ee2793e19@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:36:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Oguz Bektas References: <20220328095330.512901-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> From: Fabian Ebner In-Reply-To: <20220328095330.512901-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.923 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.732 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [pveam.pm] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] fix #3961: pveam: error if storage doesn't exist on 'list' X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 07:37:29 -0000 Am 28.03.22 um 11:53 schrieb Oguz Bektas: > Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas > --- > PVE/CLI/pveam.pm | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/PVE/CLI/pveam.pm b/PVE/CLI/pveam.pm > index 6c26f209..0ad33823 100644 > --- a/PVE/CLI/pveam.pm > +++ b/PVE/CLI/pveam.pm > @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({ > > my $cfg = PVE::Storage::config(); > > + die "Storage does not exist!\n" if !defined($cfg->{ids}->{$storeid}); Using PVE::Storage::storage_check_enabled() would additionally catch disabled storages and existing storages that are not available on the current node. > + > die "Storage does not support templates!\n" if !$cfg->{ids}->{$storeid}->{content}->{vztmpl}; > > my $vollist = PVE::Storage::volume_list($cfg, $storeid, undef, 'vztmpl');