From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC889A16D for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:49:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD8991FF88 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:49:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:49:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E5C7243DA0; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:49:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <7c4c47d3-f216-30ce-952b-62c7e0ba65ce@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:49:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Content-Language: en-US To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" , "w.bumiller@proxmox.com" Cc: "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" , "aderumier@odiso.com" References: <20231115215843.856752-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <22427644-8456-fa1c-92f7-aa5386127fc7@proxmox.com> <300e8e6526824d5c31aa7677bd030ade872572c3.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> <5db00bdc7d77c4bce037c1823a56150eb4b5ec15.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> <11fe3e649370ae17a659606a126f6ed1c9aff4cc.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> From: Stefan Hanreich In-Reply-To: <11fe3e649370ae17a659606a126f6ed1c9aff4cc.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 2.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -3.265 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH dnsmasq 0/1] purge previous ip/mac lease of dhcp reply X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:49:41 -0000 On 11/17/23 11:46, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote: > The problem is that dbus is only working with 1 instance of dnsmasq. :/ > > That mean it'll not work if we need mulitple instance, in differents > zones/vrf for example You should be able to set the service name via `--enable-dbus` then you can handle multiple instances if I'm not mistaken.