From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C5D870CE1 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:57:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 285AB2250E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:56:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 690AA224FD for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:56:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 380E444C56 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:56:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <7b220b75-4598-d02c-6b03-ee17df48fd81@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:55:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/93.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Lorenz Stechauner References: <20210928075300.2328321-1-l.stechauner@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20210928075300.2328321-1-l.stechauner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.752 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -3.03 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [wiktionary.org, dict.cc] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] ui: dc/OptionView: maximal -> maximum X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:57:21 -0000 On 28.09.21 09:52, Lorenz Stechauner wrote: > Signed-off-by: Lorenz Stechauner > --- > www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js > index edae97ea..a8f1ea6a 100644 > --- a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js > +++ b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js > @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.dc.OptionView', { > backendUnit: "KiB", > }], > }); > - me.add_integer_row('max_workers', gettext('Maximal Workers/bulk-action'), { > + me.add_integer_row('max_workers', gettext('Maximum Workers/bulk-action'), { hmm, it definitively sounds like it could be a false friend for German native speakers, but "maximal" seems to be OK too, at least if one can believe dict.cc and/or wiktionary: https://en-de.dict.cc/?s=maximal https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/maximal Or do I overlook something here? > deleteEmpty: true, > defaultValue: 4, > minValue: 1, >