From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2201A1FF16F for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:05:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 14305176D6; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:05:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <79afe099-60a9-4b85-ba90-10837ded5d76@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:04:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20240325170149.1142780-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <84e5f699-7f94-4a66-815c-6922f577793a@proxmox.com> <2bf44af9-b3bd-4b25-b22f-34ea48ccc96b@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Stefan Hanreich In-Reply-To: <2bf44af9-b3bd-4b25-b22f-34ea48ccc96b@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.660 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network] fix #5324: non vlanaware zone: add mtu to veth links X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 11/15/24 15:58, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 15.11.24 um 14:44 schrieb Stefan Hanreich: >>> Shouldn't we try to get the MTU of the bridge when it's set to 'auto' >>> and then setup the other interfaces accordingly? Or am I >>> misunderstanding what 'auto' does? >> >> While this is still an issue, it at least makes the MTU work if it is >> explicitly set, we can add the functionality for auto in a subsequent patch. >> > > so should this be applied as is for now? Yes, it only improves the current state (where neither explicit MTU nor auto are working). _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel