From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5E21FF0AE for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:03:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C2D0221595; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:03:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <77303a5b-ce6f-47ba-832d-73fdcf4f220a@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:02:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH ifupdown2 v2 11/27] d/patches: add support for VXLAN-GBP flag To: Gabriel Goller References: <20260709091852.538885-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> <20260709091852.538885-12-h.laimer@proxmox.com> From: Hannes Laimer Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1789462963162 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.517 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: UKC4BRHB62HZDE7R6RY55IQ7O66Q57D7 X-Message-ID-Hash: UKC4BRHB62HZDE7R6RY55IQ7O66Q57D7 X-MailFrom: h.laimer@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 2026-09-15 10:35, Gabriel Goller wrote: > This patch would be nice to apply standalone, because there were a few people > who had gbp traffic coming from cisco or juniper, which was otherwise dropped. > > There is currently no good option, except to hand-create all the vxlan > interfaces using iproute2 commands. also thought that :P [1] is basically the same as this, with a tiny change mentioned there > > Consider: > > Reviewed-by: Gabriel Goller > Tested-by: Gabriel Goller [1] https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260828134708.692354-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com/