From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB221FF15E for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:40:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C6CD668F3; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:40:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <766af997-a62a-4dd2-804f-9c018cd7b707@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:39:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Prashant Patil <Prashant.Gamepatil@veritas.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> References: <PH0PR20MB4520A4201D4560B18A0C830798C82@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR20MB45201A18272FF3B7B386D98B98C82@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <2402a2e8-63a5-46c4-9b66-d998f6e421c7@proxmox.com> <mailman.766.1741156631.293.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> <c355aa91-fcdf-46d2-9ed7-89c215ae5d01@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520C688E38C97D5DE5FC25B98DF2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <51c423c9-786c-4881-8819-83c075c89b36@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520276B3A7061528854180598DF2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR20MB45209D60E2A2A691D643A3C998DE2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <9963c93c-29a7-4d20-b282-ec5629d812a8@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520584B52872E16277A621198A42@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <3c13a721-14c4-41ae-8ad2-b52a2d84bd38@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520FF39B329114AB45B2ADD98A72@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <PH0PR20MB4520FF39B329114AB45B2ADD98A72@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.040 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] About PVE Backup Integration Guide X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Cc: Anuradha Joshi <Anuradha.Joshi@veritas.com>, Sudhir Subbarao <Sudhir.Subbarao@veritas.com>, Jason Voneberstein <Jason.vonEberstein@veritas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Am 25.03.25 um 11:23 schrieb Prashant Patil: >> There are pre-built packages with the series incorporated available at [0] with SHA256SUM [1]. > > Does that mean the backup provider plugin is not yet available as part of any qemu/proxmox release? If not in the released version, then which version would have these changes? Yes, that's what it means. There is no ETA for when it will be released exactly, but it might be in one of the next versions. But again, if you wait until it is actually released, it will be harder for us to retroactively incorporate changes/feedback that would benefit your use case. Best Regards, Fiona _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel