From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58A53799D6 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:52:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 49986129F1 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8644B129E0 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:52:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5971645FDB for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:52:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <7553f6f6-1439-f841-a523-b9bfcd3b35d4@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:52:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/94.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Reiter References: <20211027113454.2079862-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20211027113454.2079862-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.180 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, qemuserver.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: Re: [PATCH qemu-server] vzdump: increase timeout for QMP 'cont' after backup start X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:52:40 -0000 On 27/10/2021 13:34, Stefan Reiter wrote: > Since 'backup' can now work asynchronously, QEMU may not be ready to > receive the next QMP command ('cont') immediately. Thus, increase the > timeout, to avoid aborted backups in slow environments. > > There may be a deeper QEMU bug hidden under the covers here too, but at > least one user reported success with simply increasing the timeout: > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve7-pbs2-backup-timeout-qmp-command-cont-failed-got-timeout.95212/page-2#post-426261 > > See also: > https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/problem-seit-update-auf-7-0.97388/ > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/error-with-backup-when-backing-up-qmp-command-query-backup-failed-got-wrong-command-id.88017/page-3#post-416339 > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter > --- > PVE/VZDump/QemuServer.pm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > applied, thanks!