From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D26ED78D57 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:56:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C23C32EA78 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2CE5C43D94 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <7493074a-4140-feb6-e6bc-2ec542958d93@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:55:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Dominik Csapak , Dietmar Maurer References: <212652737.3945.1656586923044@webmail.proxmox.com> <725dbe83-2a4c-7eab-a053-3f87f2be5f51@proxmox.com> <14c7b0c7-f379-6a97-6e4a-21e103690b40@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <14c7b0c7-f379-6a97-6e4a-21e103690b40@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] vncpropxy question X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:56:17 -0000 On 30/06/2022 13:50, Dominik Csapak wrote: > > we could even go a step further and remove support for terminals > over vnc completely, since we have support for that in the > browser with xterm.js since quite some time and spiceterm, which can make some sense to keep to provide a single client that can do all and is relatively feature full (also, IIRC, Dietmar wasn't to happen when I proposed dropping both for 7.0, but at least vncterm could really go with future 8.0 next year IMO)