From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674B31FF15F for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:36:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E676F117E2; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:36:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <748d0d02-9429-4a57-99af-5113ac0e2690@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:36:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Hannes Duerr References: <20241120112610.160234-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com> <20241120112610.160234-2-h.duerr@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <20241120112610.160234-2-h.duerr@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.016 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmx-nvidia-vgpu-helper 1/2] debian/control: adjust description and pve-manager dependency X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 11/20/24 12:26, Hannes Duerr wrote: > remove the dependency of proxmox-dkms, since this package does not > exist, and add the dependency of pve-manager, which should be installed > with every reasonable Proxmox VE installation, so that the package can > already be installed during the installation. > i think that's in reverse? we don't need pve-manager here AFAICT, but if we want a dependency somewhere, we'd want to add this package as a dependency of pve-manager, no? from the current state of this package I don't see a reason to depend on any pve/proxmox packages > Signed-off-by: Hannes Duerr > --- > debian/control | 11 +++++------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index 1c19a50..f119bdc 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -8,11 +8,10 @@ Homepage: https://www.proxmox.com > > Package: proxmox-nvidia-vgpu-helper > Architecture: all > -Depends: proxmox-dkms, > +Depends: libapt-pkg-perl, > + pve-manager, > ${misc:Depends}, > -Description: Proxmox Nvidia vGPU systemd service > - This package helps with the configuration of Nvidia vGPU > - drivers by providing a systemd template service which > +Description: Proxmox Nvidia vGPU helper script and systemd service > + This package provides a script, that helps with installing all required > + packages for the Nvidia vGPU driver, and also a systemd template service which > configures the option SRI-OV per pci-id > - > - _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel