From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463E876CA5 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:23:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3701E131CC for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:23:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C57DF131C1 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:23:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B48245E89 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:23:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <7209d9f5-9b43-a882-ea0c-ca010aa79f09@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:23:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/94.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Aaron Lauterer , Dominik Csapak References: <20210922092749.2386238-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <724abcda-3bda-dbe6-ac18-7b81339fe284@proxmox.com> <641ef788-8ede-d6dc-7697-2fa41ee00a5e@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <641ef788-8ede-d6dc-7697-2fa41ee00a5e@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.331 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -2.267 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] partially-applied: [PATCH manager v2 00/12] multi tab disk panel & multi disk wizard X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:23:45 -0000 On 19.10.21 15:04, Aaron Lauterer wrote: >> >> applied=C2=A0above,=C2=A0delayed=C2=A0below;=C2=A0mostly=C2=A0because=C2= =A0I'd=C2=A0like=C2=A0to=C2=A0have=C2=A0some=C2=A0feedback=C2=A0from >> others=C2=A0here=C2=A0and=C2=A0I'd=C2=A0also=C2=A0like=C2=A0to=C2=A0ha= ve=C2=A0the=C2=A0same=C2=A0for=C2=A0CT,=C2=A0to=C2=A0avoid=C2=A0a=C2=A0fe= ature=C2=A0drift=C2=A0in >> the=C2=A0wizards. >=20 > I took the last two patches for a quick spin, and I have to say that I = do > like the functionality. Yes it does change the way one interacts with t= he > wizard quite a bit, but it really makes it so much easier to create VMs= with > no disks at all (useful when preparing for qm importdisk) or more than = one > disk. Thanks for the feedback, appreciated, for the record a v3 from that serie= s was already available (as you've now seen yourself, just wanted to ensure other devs = see that this is the reason the remaining v2 patches will not be used)