From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5FE09B583
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:57:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A80FB1C6AF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:56:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:56:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C0A82434E4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:56:37 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <71785d19-1491-4bbf-ba03-d827ea8a14f5@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:56:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Hannes Duerr <h.duerr@proxmox.com>
References: <20231117121726.119792-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com>
 <20231117121726.119792-2-h.duerr@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231117121726.119792-2-h.duerr@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.078 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v5 qemu-server 1/4] Move path_is_scsi to
 QemuServer/Drive.pm
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:57:08 -0000

Am 17.11.23 um 13:17 schrieb Hannes Duerr:
> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm b/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm
> index e24ba12..dce1398 100644
> --- a/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm
> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm

(...)

> +    my $fh = IO::File->new("+<$path") || return;

There's no "use IO::File;" yet in this module, so it should be added. I
guess it works, because of the "use PVE::Storage;", but being explicit
is always better. Perl is sadly very lax about such things.