From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D83F66A114
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:41:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C88C7D74B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:40:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BFEC9D739
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:40:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 897EF441C5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:40:43 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <70b8efd7-0f8c-3893-b95b-86ce61d6a714@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:40:42 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:86.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/86.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
References: <20210212172831.26521-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210212172831.26521-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.310 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH zfsonlinux] update submodule and
 patches to zfs-2.0.3
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:41:14 -0000

On 12.02.21 18:28, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> ---
> did a quick test on my zfs storage-replication testcluster:
> * both systems failed to import their zfs pools upon boot (I'm quite sure
>   it's related to upstream commit 642d86af0d91b2bf88d5ea34cb6888b03c39c459)
> * both systems were used for running the zfs testsuite - so probably don't
>   really represent a clean production-ready state
> * importing the pool worked after a manual import (consistently, even
>   after reboots)
> * did not have similiar issues on 4 other systems I tested this on
> 
>  ...ith-d-dev-disk-by-id-in-scan-service.patch |  2 +-
>  .../0010-Set-file-mode-during-zfs_write.patch | 39 -------------------
>  debian/patches/series                         |  1 -
>  upstream                                      |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 debian/patches/0010-Set-file-mode-during-zfs_write.patch
> 
>

applied, thanks!