From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A8E996346 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:30:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 16AD313DEE for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:29:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:29:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2FC6E47FC0; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:29:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <6f0faf71-10c6-4ffd-b5ac-dbc925dd2804@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:29:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20240223092436.202277-1-roland.kammerer@linbit.com> <20240223092436.202277-2-roland.kammerer@linbit.com> From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20240223092436.202277-2-roland.kammerer@linbit.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] storage/plugins: pass scfg to parse_volname X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:30:23 -0000 Am 23.02.24 um 10:24 schrieb Roland Kammerer: > This passes the well known $scfg to parse_volname and bumps the API > versions accordingly. This allows plugins to access their configuration > if necessary. > Hi, can you please describe your use case in more detail? Why does parsing the volume name depend on something in the storage configuration? Best Regards, Fiona