From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC767136C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:14:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 26B6A19E6D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:14:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B92A619E64
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:14:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B5C4433EA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 12:14:31 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <6db2541d-ad6e-aafb-4238-93d62cafae58@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 12:14:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/101.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
References: <20220511092707.155595-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220511092707.155595-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH pve-cluster] cluster config: mark
 qdevice end point as protected
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 10:14:32 -0000

Am 5/11/22 um 11:27 schrieb Stefan Sterz:
> this allows the end point to retrieve data from the qdevice properly
> by leveraging pve-daemon. fixes an issue where the api would return an
> empty object.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  data/PVE/API2/ClusterConfig.pm | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>=20
>

applied, with O=C4=9Fuz T-b tag and some more info about the actual probl=
em in
the commit message, thanks!