From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B307D84C for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:48:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ED3CE196B0 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:48:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:48:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D5ECF42742; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:48:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6d130a5e-583d-17e2-8870-7aed2ae42174@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:48:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:103.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/103.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20220719114639.3035048-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.092 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [linux-magazine.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH many] add cluster-wide hardware device mapping X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:48:42 -0000 On 7/21/22 14:29, Gilberto Ferreira via pve-devel wrote: > > It's nice to hear about this patch. > For now, as a workaround, when I need a usb device (like a stick for > instance), I am using USB Over IP, like you can read in this article > https://www.linux-magazine.com/Issues/2018/208/Tutorial-USB-IP#:~:text=It's%20called%20USB%2FIP%20(read,directly%20to%20the%20client%20machine > . > > Perhaps this patch will do the same job? > > Gilberto this patch alone, no i don't think so. it only enables offline migration (because live migration with host hardware is not possible currently) for usb we could in the future think about unplugging before and plugging after live migration, but there are still missing pieces for that aside from this series (usb hotplug is not finished yet completely) so if you need live migration with your solution, i'd continue to use that