From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5FD1FF170 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:35:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9A99F35E90; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:36:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6a67b0b0-0785-41eb-8821-027ffd672820@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:35:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20250724093224.70863-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Stefan Hanreich In-Reply-To: <20250724093224.70863-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.703 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] superseded: [PATCH manager 0/4] improvements to proxmox-network-interface-pinning X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" forgot to run make tidy... https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250724093459.76397-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com/T/#t On 7/24/25 11:32, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > Several improvements to the network interface pinning tool: > * interfaces are now iterated according to ifindex > * output of the mapping is now sorted and less verbose > * users can now set a specific target name > * if has been introduced as an additional legal prefix > > Still looking into removing the PHYSICAL_NIC_RE altogether, but sending this > patch series as-is nevertheless for review / feedback. If I manage to remove the > PHYSICAL_NIC_RE in time, we could get rid of the constraints of prefix / > target-name altogether... > > pve-manager: > > Stefan Hanreich (4): > network-interface-pinning: use ifindex as order for pinning > network-interface-pinning: improve printing mapping > network-interface-pinning: add target-name parameter > network-interface-pinning: add if prefix to list of allowed prefixes > > PVE/CLI/proxmox_network_interface_pinning.pm | 76 +++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > Summary over all repositories: > 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel