From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B472A98870 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:56:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 94B488BD4 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:56:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:56:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB2CC42F18; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:56:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <69542577-6d32-c7d8-1b22-2dfe901c45d7@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:56:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Alexandre Derumier References: <20231115142208.563587-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <20231115142208.563587-3-aderumier@odiso.com> From: Stefan Hanreich In-Reply-To: <20231115142208.563587-3-aderumier@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 2.255 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -3.695 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-container 1/6] nic hotplug : add|del ips in ipam X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:56:19 -0000 On 11/15/23 15:21, Alexandre Derumier wrote: > + if ($have_sdn) { > + PVE::Network::SDN::Vnets::add_next_free_cidr($newnet->{bridge}, $conf->{hostname}, $newnet->{hwaddr}, "vmid: $vmid", undef, 1); > + } Maybe I missed something, but with Containers we can select either Static or DHCP. How is this handled? How should we actually handle this? I would suppose it would make sense that this logic only kicks in when the NIC is actually set to DHCP, otherwise we shouldn't do anything? Also, this is still passing $description rather an a $vmid > + PVE::Network::SDN::Vnets::add_next_free_cidr($newnet->{bridge}, $conf->{hostname}, $newnet->{hwaddr}, "vmid: $vmid", undef, 1); ^ description instead of vmid as well