From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E45D1FF162
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Apr 2025 17:37:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B09E635C3;
	Mon,  7 Apr 2025 17:37:54 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <67e9aca4-3a46-48c5-a7bf-532f236b2fac@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 17:37:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20250307125056.169575-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Hannes Duerr <h.duerr@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250307125056.169575-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.039 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 1/4] subnet: dhcp: improve
 Net::IP usage
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Tested all 4 Patches and didn't run into any regressions.
Please consider this

Tested-by: Hannes Duerr <h.duerr@proxmox.com>

On 3/7/25 13:50, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> This simplifies the comparison of IPs by using the object-oriented
> interface over the procedural one. Also instantiate the ips using the
> new method rather than using new, which isn't a keyword in Perl. This
> fixes the respective perlcritic warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
>   src/PVE/Network/SDN/SubnetPlugin.pm | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/SubnetPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/SubnetPlugin.pm
> index 049f7e1..4bff2dd 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/SubnetPlugin.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/SubnetPlugin.pm
> @@ -86,13 +86,13 @@ sub validate_dhcp_ranges {
>   	my $dhcp_start = $dhcp_range->{'start-address'};
>   	my $dhcp_end = $dhcp_range->{'end-address'};
>   
> -	my $start_ip = new Net::IP($dhcp_start);
> +	my $start_ip = Net::IP->new($dhcp_start);
>   	raise_param_exc({ 'dhcp-range' => "start-adress is not a valid IP $dhcp_start" }) if !$start_ip;
>   
> -	my $end_ip = new Net::IP($dhcp_end);
> +	my $end_ip = Net::IP->new($dhcp_end);
>   	raise_param_exc({ 'dhcp-range' => "end-adress is not a valid IP $dhcp_end" }) if !$end_ip;
>   
> -	if (Net::IP::ip_bincomp($end_ip->binip(), 'lt', $start_ip->binip()) == 1) {
> +	if ($start_ip->bincomp('gt', $end_ip)) {
>   	    raise_param_exc({ 'dhcp-range' => "start-address $dhcp_start must be smaller than end-address $dhcp_end" })
>   	}
>   


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel