From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EFEB944DB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:12:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 46E572714C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:12:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:12:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4CBF84837C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:12:04 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <6657bf04-1233-b419-e489-1545f6d98d13@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:12:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:110.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/110.0
Content-Language: en-GB, de-AT
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Leo Nunner <l.nunner@proxmox.com>
References: <20221117131827.85407-1-l.nunner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221117131827.85407-1-l.nunner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.051 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [qemuserver.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 qemu-server] fix #4249: make
 qemu_img_convert respect bwlimit
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 16:12:07 -0000

Am 17/11/2022 um 14:18 schrieb Leo Nunner:
> Previously, cloning a stopped VM didn't respect bwlimit. Passing the -r
> (ratelimit) parameter to qemu-img convert fixes this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Nunner <l.nunner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
>     - Remove unneeded "undef"s, as to not unnecessarily touch unrelated
>       lines
>     - Add test for bwlimit
> 
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm                  |  5 ++--
>  test/run_qemu_img_convert_tests.pl | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!