From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E871FF16F for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:50:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 18B197A24; Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:50:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <65b843b1-af29-40fd-807c-3f2e4d03ae94@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:49:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Prashant Patil <Prashant.Gamepatil@veritas.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> References: <PH0PR20MB4520A4201D4560B18A0C830798C82@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <2402a2e8-63a5-46c4-9b66-d998f6e421c7@proxmox.com> <mailman.766.1741156631.293.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> <c355aa91-fcdf-46d2-9ed7-89c215ae5d01@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520C688E38C97D5DE5FC25B98DF2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <51c423c9-786c-4881-8819-83c075c89b36@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520276B3A7061528854180598DF2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR20MB45209D60E2A2A691D643A3C998DE2@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <9963c93c-29a7-4d20-b282-ec5629d812a8@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520584B52872E16277A621198A42@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <3c13a721-14c4-41ae-8ad2-b52a2d84bd38@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB4520FF39B329114AB45B2ADD98A72@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <766af997-a62a-4dd2-804f-9c018cd7b707@proxmox.com> <PH0PR20MB452084FCE3C6D7DD55BDEBC398A62@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <PH0PR20MB452084FCE3C6D7DD55BDEBC398A62@PH0PR20MB4520.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.040 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] About PVE Backup Integration Guide X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Cc: Anuradha Joshi <Anuradha.Joshi@veritas.com>, Sudhir Subbarao <Sudhir.Subbarao@veritas.com>, Jason Voneberstein <Jason.vonEberstein@veritas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Am 26.03.25 um 16:06 schrieb Prashant Patil: > Hi Fiona, > Which proxmox version those patches shared earlier are based off? And are there any specific steps/sequence to install those patches. I know we can install package through "dpkg -i". The packages are based on the current master branches in git [0] which can be slightly ahead of packages available in public repositories. You should upgrade to the latest available versions from the test repository[1][2] and then there should be no issues installing the packages on top. If there are, please let us know! Using apt install ./*.deb is recommended, because dpkg by itself will not check for dependencies. [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?o=age [1]: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_Repositories#sysadmin_test_repo [2]: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#system_software_updates Best Regards, Fiona _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel