From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8603588EF for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 69F98AAC1 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BA1BC47B3F for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6434912e-9b66-459e-c49b-634c401ca7af@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Hanreich , Thomas Lamprecht References: <20230830155001.2249173-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <4ec3e6ba-3d2d-7bc8-ccaa-344f3b778d69@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <4ec3e6ba-3d2d-7bc8-ccaa-344f3b778d69@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.295 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -1.242 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH edk2-firmware v2] update to edk2-stable202308 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:28:09 -0000 Am 31.08.23 um 14:47 schrieb Stefan Hanreich: > On 8/31/23 14:39, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> Am 30/08/2023 um 17:50 schrieb Stefan Hanreich: >>> * Removed 0001-OvmfPkg-PlatformInitLib-limit-phys-bits-to-46.patch >>>    since it has been included upstream since commit c1e85376 [1]. >>> >>> * Updated the patch >>>    Revert-ArmVirtPkg-make-EFI_LOADER_DATA-non-executabl so it applies >>>    again. >>> >>> * had to increase FD_SIZE to 4M for the x64 build as otherwise the >>>    package wouldn't build due to the size of the resulting image >> >> I mean new versions are great and what not, but is there a reason why you >> send this update now? Maybe fix some issue our users face? If so, it'd be >> great if you could record that here. >> > > I've been trying to reproduce an issue one of our users is facing and > wanted to check whether newer firmware versions trigger the issue as > well. Currently, this issue seems fixed with the newer firmware although > it's hard to say since there is no definite reproducer. To be a bit more precise, it's an issue were a RHEL VM with 4.x kernel gets stuck after guest reboot, as far as we can tell right after OVMF initialization. Mira and Stefan were able to reproduce the issue semi-regularly with a bunch of VMs rebooting periodically. And Stefan said it didn't yet trigger with the updated edk2 package for a few days now. We can't be sure, as it is a race after all, but it does sound promising.