From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA8B3606FF for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:57:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A2ED813D62 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7FA7113D53 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:56:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4D8AF44AD7 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:56:53 +0200 (CEST) To: PVE development discussion , Mira Limbeck References: <20200529122206.31787-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: <61d8ed34-7ea5-9e70-70ee-5c796d4dd82b@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:56:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/81.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200529122206.31787-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.184 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [firewall.pm, rules.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 firewall] introduce new icmp-type parameter X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:57:24 -0000 On 29.05.20 14:22, Mira Limbeck wrote: > Currently icmp types are handled via 'dport'. This is not documented > anywhere except for a single line of comment in the code. To untangle > the icmp-type handling from the dport handling a new 'icmp-type' > parameter is introduced. > > The valid 'icmp-type' values are limited to the names > (icmp[v6]_type_names hash in the code, same as ip[6]tables provides). > Type[/Code] values are not supported. > > Support for ipv6-icmp is added to icmp-type parameter handling. This makes it > possible to specify icmpv6 types via the GUI. > > Signed-off-by: Mira Limbeck > --- > v2: > - rebased on master > - removed type[/code] value support, now only names are accepted > > src/PVE/API2/Firewall/Rules.pm | 4 +++ > src/PVE/Firewall.pm | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > applied, thanks!