From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74BBE6E96F for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:56:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 667F7D38E for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:56:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A4A62D382 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:56:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id y5so4390650edp.8 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:56:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VH4d0fSWzlCe27c07fG4N/Maf2LiZUtcd652392t1dk=; b=RHHLRSaXGNZr/CfFfFh6hv/0MxOwCPbeg+TSLnKHQe2eEKf6veTgJ6GKPUqJ3Hyae2 E0mqGMzN+oN7uzQRkji3Q+spR+3M7ozNqLQaN0QLHYViIdpilhYnCsq/bNW0V8xZJ1FD VQo95CGNe0zSmW3TvL712i2bD8GbRCUTiin9UbS7D8Dq6zwwjZPv61/416ntfUhQBhQa 9zu6mSpbYy9WI6tTuCYR+/6eUFRe3FwwxhvJESesWdNDeJfrnNQTLUzsYRhsRcvVoDFr Ru7QW6acmwRLK+QZ38wiwHnnd6FEIidlepQh+KMqNUb7Wv5Lgwt/pWeVAvYUAnrnIloO ytsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VH4d0fSWzlCe27c07fG4N/Maf2LiZUtcd652392t1dk=; b=epSW5otjglH4E+WiHjAROySB3KwdPOzA21L/zEQ3PPIrp9cHeaA+bZ6/WNe7FBHRa+ CORK0DUcNU9F+PVGTImEwFTrDY78vM2pbtZZDWToqYxUm54pt+gImbe2h6FEzdgYfVnV E9FFpibj0pPLsK4aWioSlYFsa90Ej3xitOi5WTsWZKfvrSnoF+DZ0tr3LN62IAREy4i0 PwKzPyULSFwVjX5TNa8BIBYoz7TNRU0PsmLwMlBT8WMq4wy7mKJHuP9xBBSF0HrkLuSc t9coK2nUZcKSHHuDmUOVHKx+QC5DjC256nCAQXAUphk7gi6QtEkuGD0BRp3Io2hXYAdZ ZyTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303s2mQgPPzhL/rqGA5GWelSWasg05ghL6oUcbS4HiRHc2ESSUn O/NMGd/lidFiDaGBlNHvSCCmbBUGUDaDFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4cslEXF0PfuyTrC4wzFRc7iBNwec9O56oZVAvE00f/JG5/QveugjG6zlgaYXaFnbDSNmOGw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d04:: with SMTP id dg4mr6224447edb.157.1629870957264; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.50] ([79.132.253.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s3sm10564983ejm.49.2021.08.24.22.55.56 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5f2911bdc581cd9ff71eb935d5b83fb4847036c8.camel@odiso.com> From: alexandre derumier To: pve-devel Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:55:55 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.714 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] debian11 ifslave bonding bug (with ifupdown1) X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:56:08 -0000 Hi, multiple users have reported problems if ifenslave (ifupdown1), (maintly upgrade from proxmox6 without switch to ifupdown2) when physical interfaces have "auto .." auto eth0 iface eth0  ... auto eth1 iface eth1 .... auto bond0 iface bond0 bond-slaves eth0 eth1 it seem to come from a bug in ifenslave pre-up script https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968368 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990428 patch here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=2;bug=968368;filename=ifenslave-args.diff;msg=5 Maybe it could be great to add a note in the upgrade procedure about this until it's fixed. (or maybe provide a fixed proxmox ifenslave package) Regards, Aleandre