From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84C31FF0BC
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:36:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ECECA213DC;
	Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:36:48 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5ec6ad07-7a3b-4195-991a-73042637d8fe@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:36:45 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [RFC proxmox-perl-rs/qemu-server/qemu-server-rs v2 0/9]
 pci-handling rewrite (part 1/2/3)
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20261015081041.743422-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20261015081041.743422-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793288206011
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.322 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: LFMWPKSGZARYX2QIJG24ZVZ3RL7POFLA
X-Message-ID-Hash: LFMWPKSGZARYX2QIJG24ZVZ3RL7POFLA
X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

Am 15.10.26 um 10:11 AM schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> ## Phase 4 - Host and NUMA layouts (the next part)
> 
> With all the pieces in place, we can then easily extend the new layout by PCI
> switches that are needed for assigning to NUMA nodes and replicating the host
> topology for passed through devices.
Can you describe the planned VM configuration settings for this? How do
they fit alongside/relate to the "pci-layout" option you introduce in
patch 9/9? It would be nice to know before the "pci-layout" option is
set in stone.