From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3191FF165
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 514F939047;
Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:18:38 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5e4910e7-d5bc-49a2-b09b-c792009dd5e1@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:18:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
References: <20250410105925.174008-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250410105925.174008-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.036 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix: also add resource mappings
that do not exist to missing mappings
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Am 10.04.25 um 12:59 schrieb Markus Frank:
> Currently you get a "Can't use an undefined value..." error because all
> get_node_mapping functions return undefined if there is no resource
> mapping entry for the id.
>
> Fixes: a52eb3c4e ("check local resources: extend for mapped resources")
> Signed-off-by: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
> ---
> This patch supersedes "fix: print error message that the resource
> mapping entry does not exist"
>
> PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> index ccdceedc..2790942c 100644
> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> @@ -2512,7 +2512,7 @@ sub check_local_resources {
> } elsif ($type eq 'dir') {
> $entry = PVE::Mapping::Dir::get_node_mapping($dir_map, $id, $node);
> }
> - if (!scalar($entry->@*)) {
> + if (!$entry || !scalar($entry->@*)) {
> push @{$missing_mappings_by_node->{$node}}, $key;
> }
> }
Looking at this more closely, I think v1 is better actually. Sorry, I
had misunderstood the exact situation when the issue happens.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel