From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A2191F83
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:35:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 31DC71FE3A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:35:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:35:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 548DF4852B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:35:26 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5e1c7d8f-6685-4416-a683-56f4a7f6c062@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:35:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-AT, en-US
From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20231123160902.282661-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
 <ddb7ff33-8a00-4719-8389-0f06e725efd1@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <ddb7ff33-8a00-4719-8389-0f06e725efd1@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/2] ui: dc: backup: improve UX for
 the different 'notification-mode's
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:35:57 -0000

ping 🙂 still applies on latest master. Also tested it again to make sure
that no other changes interfered with it in the meanwhile.

On 1/8/24 11:43, Lukas Wagner wrote:
> ping
> 
> On 11/23/23 17:09, Lukas Wagner wrote:
>>    - Switch order of 'mailto' and 'mailnotification' field
>>    - When mode is 'auto', disable 'mailtnotification' field
>>    - When mode is 'auto' and 'mailto' is empty, show
>>      hint that the notification system will be used
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>


-- 
- Lukas