From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 276C41FF15F for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:45:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E270012998; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:45:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5ce36d60-6818-44d7-bb36-d0e416a08707@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:45:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20241120112610.160234-1-h.duerr@proxmox.com> <20241120112610.160234-2-h.duerr@proxmox.com> <748d0d02-9429-4a57-99af-5113ac0e2690@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hannes_D=C3=BCrr?= <h.duerr@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <748d0d02-9429-4a57-99af-5113ac0e2690@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.035 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmx-nvidia-vgpu-helper 1/2] debian/control: adjust description and pve-manager dependency X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> On 12/2/24 09:36, Dominik Csapak wrote: > i think that's in reverse? we don't need pve-manager here AFAICT, > but if we want a dependency somewhere, we'd want to add this package > as a dependency of pve-manager, no? > > from the current state of this package I don't see a reason to depend > on any pve/proxmox packages Yes, thomas has already given me that as feedback, I just wanted to wait for your feedback before sending a V2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel