From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6847245B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:02:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 716B42BA0E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:02:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0A0402B9FF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:02:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D1D0545B74
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:02:12 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5cc148a7-7b36-c72b-3912-99c774a67591@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:02:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/89.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210511125955.25105-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210511125955.25105-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.007 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH-SERIES zsync] fix #3351: allow
 keeping a different number of snapshots on source and destination
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:02:13 -0000

On 11.05.21 14:59, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> by introducing a new dest-maxsnap parameter which can be used to override
> maxsnap for the destination side.
> 
> This is useful for backups, as one can potentially save a lot of space on the
> source side by keeping fewer snapshots around.
> 
> 
> Fabian Ebner (6):
>   param_to_job: handle --maxsnap 0 on creation
>   usage: improve maxsnap description
>   remove all old snapshots belonging to a job
>   snapshot_get: make interface agnostic to source/dest
>   snapshot_destroy: make interface agnostic to source/dest
>   fix #3351: allow keeping a different number of snapshots on source and
>     destination
> 
>  pve-zsync | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 


applied series, thanks!