From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E847F1FF16F for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:41:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 74ABD3F9B0; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:42:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5c7e778b-1b9d-4bc0-9ab3-dd74c9c1b318@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:42:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Daniel Kral References: <20250804141204.207216-1-d.kral@proxmox.com> <20250804141204.207216-3-d.kral@proxmox.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_K=C3=B6ppl?= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20250804141204.207216-3-d.kral@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1754379731030 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.011 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 3/5] ha: rules: document crs behavior for split positive resource affinity X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 8/4/25 16:12, Daniel Kral wrote: > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral > --- > ha-manager.adoc | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/ha-manager.adoc b/ha-manager.adoc > index 5d75287..e18a14d 100644 > --- a/ha-manager.adoc > +++ b/ha-manager.adoc > @@ -787,6 +787,11 @@ HA resources `vm:101` and `vm:102` are each in a positive resource affinity > rule, then it is the same as if `vm:100`, `vm:101` and `vm:102` would have been > in a single positive resource affinity rule. > > +NOTE: If the HA resources of a positive resource affinity rule are currently > +running on different nodes, the CRS will move the HA resources to the node, > +where most of them are running already. If there is a tie in the HA resource > +count, the node with the alphabetically first name is chosen. maybe something like: "the node whose name appears first alphabetically is selected" just a suggestion, though > + > However, suppose there are computationally expensive, and/or distributed > programs running on the HA resources `vm:200` and `ct:300`, for example, > sharded database instances. In that case, running them on the same node could _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel