From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD3D71BAA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  5 Oct 2021 10:56:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 97F742520B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  5 Oct 2021 10:55:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 31F7C251FB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  5 Oct 2021 10:55:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 074034550C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  5 Oct 2021 10:55:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5bf30146-2998-d429-5353-00d51a52a241@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:54:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/93.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
References: <20211005080952.369898-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211005080952.369898-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.225 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [setup.pm, unmanaged.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH v2 container 0/2] unmanaged
 containers
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:56:03 -0000

On 05.10.21 10:09, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> minor fix for creating unmanaged containers
> 
> v1->v2:
> * return nothing instead of an empty hash ref
> * separate patch for dropping early unmanaged return
> 
> Oguz Bektas (2):
>   setup: fix creating unmanaged containers
>   setup: drop remaining unmanaged return
> 
>  src/PVE/LXC/Setup.pm           | 2 --
>  src/PVE/LXC/Setup/Unmanaged.pm | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 



applied both patches, thanks!