From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A1B620F8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:57:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2E73BBFD1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:57:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C40E3BFC7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:57:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8D75945386
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:57:37 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Dominic_J=c3=a4ger?= <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
References: <20201210081600.37881-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <5bb02301-873d-e677-6716-64e5a5dc9e91@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:57:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/84.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201210081600.37881-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.065 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: Re: [PATCH docs] qm/pct: Add
 explanation for --purge
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:57:38 -0000

On 10/12/2020 09:15, Dominic Jäger wrote:
> This was apparently not clear enough.
> For example, see #3184.
> 
> A bit long, but I think this is a better place for additional
> information about ACL and firewall than the GUI tooltip or the
> API parameter description.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominic Jäger <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  pct.adoc | 10 ++++++++++
>  qm.adoc  |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied both patches, thanks!