From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8113C94D3A for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:37:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 629DB17958 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:37:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:37:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B78A44F0C for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:37:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5b5438fc-f117-4f25-8416-4a70c2d3afe5@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:37:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Friedrich Weber , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20240221110805.931925-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> <46cff13e-8b9f-40ed-b985-17f6245d7b98@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Aaron Lauterer In-Reply-To: <46cff13e-8b9f-40ed-b985-17f6245d7b98@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.060 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 00/22] add automated/unattended installation X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:37:55 -0000 On 2/23/24 11:19, Friedrich Weber wrote: > On 21/02/2024 12:07, Aaron Lauterer wrote: >> This patch series adds the possibility to do an automated / unattended >> installation of Proxmox VE. > > Gave this a quick spin installing some virtual PVE hosts with a simple > static IP + ext4 setup. Generated an ISO from my `answer.toml` with: > > $ mkisofs -o /var/lib/vz/template/iso/test.iso -iso-level 3 -V > proxmoxinst answer.toml > > Attached it as a second CD/DVD drive to the VM, works quite well! :) > > One thing I noticed: At first I forgot to set any `filter.` option in > the [network] section. As a result I got an "Installation aborted" after > "Setting network configuration", and nothing more in > /tmp/auto_installer.log. It makes sense that the installer can't apply > the settings without a device filter, but it would be good to get an > error message. AFAICT the same thing happens if there is no filter in > [disks]. Thanks! I will see how these checks can be made earlier and in the helper tool as well when validating an answer file. > > I hope to do some more tests next week, but wanted to report the above > already today.