From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1105163573 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:47:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 07343AF7A for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:46:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7E687AF6D for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:46:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4544B444AE for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:46:56 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Dylan Whyte References: <20200715142606.25492-1-d.whyte@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: <5b42852f-8c1c-e9b0-8e83-123e0a27235d@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:46:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200715142606.25492-1-d.whyte@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-docs 1/3] Fix typos and wording X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:47:27 -0000 On 15.07.20 16:26, Dylan Whyte wrote: > Update some lines to fix spelling and grammatical errors > > Signed-off-by: Dylan Whyte > --- > certificate-management.adoc | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/certificate-management.adoc b/certificate-management.adoc > index ce9081d..00633a1 100644 > --- a/certificate-management.adoc > +++ b/certificate-management.adoc > @@ -104,12 +104,12 @@ the {pve} cluster under your operation, are the real owner of a domain. This is > the basis building block for automatic certificate management. > > The ACME protocol specifies different types of challenges, for example the > -`http-01` where a webserver provides a file with a certain value to proof that > +`http-01` where a webserver provides a file with a certain value to prove that > it controls a domain. Sometimes this isn't possible, either because of > technical limitations or if the address a domain points to is not reachable > -from the public internet. For such cases one could use the `dns-01` challenge. > -That challenge provides also a certain value, but not over a text file, but > -through a DNS record on the authority name server of the domain. > +from the public internet. For such cases, one could use the `dns-01` challenge. > +This challenge also provides a certain value, but through a DNS record on the > +authority name server of the domain, rather than over a text file. > > [thumbnail="screenshot/gui-datacenter-acme-overview.png"] > >