From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766846498A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7422E14F9F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1319314F92
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D310145F90
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:29 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Wolfgang Link <w.link@proxmox.com>
References: <20201030090130.87599-1-w.link@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <5b2088b1-6dc9-5c90-7c4c-60450861fb07@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:23:29 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201030090130.87599-1-w.link@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.008 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.261 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pve-docs] Correct the device declaration in the
 bonding example.
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:23:30 -0000

On 30.10.20 10:01, Wolfgang Link wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Link <w.link@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  pve-network.adoc | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pve-network.adoc b/pve-network.adoc
> index 294c201..692326f 100644
> --- a/pve-network.adoc
> +++ b/pve-network.adoc
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ iface eno1 inet manual
>  
>  iface eno2 inet manual
>  
> +iface eno3 inet manual
> +
>  auto bond0
>  iface bond0 inet static
>        slaves eno1 eno2
> @@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ iface vmbr0 inet static
>          address  10.10.10.2
>          netmask  255.255.255.0
>          gateway  10.10.10.1
> -        bridge-ports eno1
> +        bridge-ports eno3

or bond0 ?

>          bridge-stp off
>          bridge-fd 0
>  
>